Google+

Putting the Food Stamp Junk Food Argument to Rest

Putting the Food Stamp Junk Food Argument to Rest

As discussed yesterday in, “How to Respond to Poor Shaming” there is a growing sentiment in social media that those that rely on food stamps should not be allowed to purchase junk food with those proceeds.  I also mentioned that today I would partake in a disemboweling of that argument.  It’s now today and that makes this go time.

Below you will find each well known premise to the argument against allowing those on food stamps to buy junk food.  I’ll then zealously refute each argument point-by-point.  

People on Welfare Spend Frivolously 

I believe this is the most often sited argument when it comes to junk food and food stamps.  I’ve witnessed folks in social media recount vivid details of people with iPhones and BMWs (I do not lie) swiping EBT cards at checkout stands with a cart full of soda and sour patch kids.  Meanwhile, they, the responsible taxpayer, suffer idly with their own basket filled with carrots and celery.  

These stereotypes run largely unchecked.  But let’s take a peek at the actual data, shall we?  It turns out that food stamp recipients make wiser food choices than the rest of us even with their limited budgets.  Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that families enrolled in public assistance programs have a total budget of half of what families not enrolled in such programs spend.  Kind of hard to fund a BMW on such a budget.  In fact, while only 3% of families that do not receive benefits go without a car, almost 25% of those on public assistance are carless.   Even more, these families devote 77% of their budget to all of the responsible stuff (housing, transportation, and food) compared to just 65% spent on the responsible stuff for families not on public assistance.  When it comes to more frivolous spending, like eating out, two-parent families who get public assistance spend 4% of their budget on eating out.  Single parents spend 3.5%.  Compare this to families not on public assistance that spend 4.5% of (their bigger) budget on eating out.  So really that is more than double the dollars spent on dining out.  

In short, families on public assistance are spending more responsibly than you are with their smaller budgets.  Take a moment to let that seep in.  While you’re at it, let this seep in too.  There is another stereotype that women on welfare will have baby after baby in order to increase their total government benefits.  The fact of the matter is that the average family size of 3.7 people holds regardless of whether a person is on public assistance or not. 

In summary, we should all directly proceed to shut our faces.  

I Have a Right Because They are Spending My Money

I hear a ton of rattle in social media about “handouts”, and many of you prefer a more controlling tactic of being able to bestow all of your vast money knowledge onto the less fortunate because it’s your tax dollars that are paying for it.  I have news for you.  Not only do 55% of the population receive direct benefits from the government, upwards of 85% of the population receive an increase in total spending power from funds provided to them by the government.  Allow me to explain.

The government has a habit of incentivizing choices and value sets that align with the public good.  For example, the government sees it as valuable for families to procreate to grow future generations of American citizens.  Due to this value, the government gives parents thousands of dollars every year in the form of a tax write off for each child they have.  Those, like me, that do not have nor want children will never receive this benefit.  Because of this you get many thousands of dollars over the course of your lifetime (from the government) that I will never receive.  Yet, I witness some parents make horrible parenting decisions.  Some parents, heaven forbid, allow their children to eat actual candy and drink actual soda.  Does that mean that their tax incentives should go away?  No.  Do I now have a right to instruct them on how to parent their children because my money is being used to help them afford their family?  Come to find out, parents get wildly angry if you attempt to parent their children.  Go figure.

80% of U.S. women have children, and over 66% of households in general contain children.  That’s only one way that the government funds values that are in line with the public good.  However, when those values are in line with those living in poverty, such as our values for nutrition, housing, or (G-d forbid) education, then they are suddenly called “handouts”.  When those values are in line with the values of the middle class or wealthy class, that “handout” distinction goes away even though in every case tax money is being used to supplement income.  

And now let me tell you to quit it with this whole “your money” thing.  Public assistance programs give people a lift up and out of poverty.  Want to know how it works?  Read the op-ed I wrote in the Cincinnati Enquirer entitled “How former homeless kid made it“.  In high school my family of four lived off of $7,800 per year in government handouts.  I benefited from empathetic taxpayers while growing up and while going through college.  Good thing too.  I’m now making a six figure salary and contributing handily towards all of the benefits that you receive from public goods as well.  

Junk Food is Bad for People

In this premise you find a wolf in sheep’s clothing casting their judgements because, well, fruits and vegetables are more nutritious than Cheetos, so food stamps should be used to buy the more nutritious alternatives.  Funny thing about that.

Turns out, we still have a whole lot to learn about food and its impact on our bodies.  For many years food scientists and healthcare providers instructed us that fats were bad.  Stay away from fats.  Fats make you fat.  Well, turns out that would have been true except it wasn’t.   A physician friend of mine, Dr. Nick van Terheyden, sent me some more recent data that was shared at the Physician Symposium at this year’s national HIMSS conference.  These “geospatial” maps use analytics to overlay childhood obesity rates in the Greater DC Metropolitan area with data on fast food purchases.  Turns out the hotspots for obesity were not the hotspots for fast food purchases.  Turns out the fight against obesity is super complicated.  Imagine that.

Screen-Shot-2015-04-23-at-10.38.07-AM-880x1024

Allow me to speak from personal experience here again.  My family was on welfare growing up.  I can assure you that none of us were receiving enough nutrition from public assistance programs to become obese.  Try the SNAP Out of It challenge yourself and you will see.  As a matter of fact, I was still but 45 pounds in the second grade.  I didn’t break 100 pounds until my second year of college.  Was this due to a “fast metabolism”?  Actually, no.  Come to find out that I actually have hypothyroidism (slow metabolism).  Like many children in this world, I simply wasn’t being fed enough.  

It Would be Easy to Monitor

Proponents of building a system that bars those receiving food stamps from purchasing certain foods feel that this program would be straightforward to monitor.  Simply remove chips, soda, and candy from the list of things welfare recipients can buy.  Easy, right?  Not so much.  

Let’s take soda first, for example.  We will simply write off all carbonated beverages.  Done.  Wait.  What about seltzer water?  Or what about kombucha?  Are they on or off the list? 

Drawing the salty snacks line should prove easier.  Chips, you are out of here!  Wait, tortilla chips too?  How about tortillas and oil?  Can I just buy those and make my own tortilla chips?  Are peanuts okay even though they are both salt ridden and high in calories?  Popcorn would certainly be off the list except it is a whole grain so that doesn’t really work either.  

Candy should certainly present us with fewer problems.  If you are in the candy aisle, then you gotta go bye bye.  Wait, what about sugar free candy? Or what about those with low blood sugar that need candy?  Would gum be off the table too?  What if I chew gum to keep me from eating ice cream?  Oh, wait, what about ice cream?  Or french fries?  Or butter?  Or ranch dressing to dip my carrot sticks in?  Are we basing all of this on fat, calories, carbs or simply overall deliciousness?  Certainly anything that is delicious must go.  

As you can see, it’s not so easy to manage after all.  Oh, and I picked the featured image of this post on purpose.  Quite adorable to see mom and daughter sharing a moment together baking cookies.  What if that mom had bought that cookie dough using an EBT card instead of cash?  Still cute?  Yes.

This is a Brand New Innovative Idea that Could Save Us All Millions

Not so much.  Yesterday my friend Don Fluckinger sent me this LA Times article from back in 2004.  Over ten years ago, the USDA rejected a proposed Minnesota ban on buying junk food with food stamps.  In fact, the USDA issued a “strongly worded” response.  They stated in their reasoning that such a measure would create both confusion and embarrassment in the grocery store aisle.   

The USDA is strongly opposed to instituting such a measure, yet we are still talking about it.  Why on Earth do we have this undercurrent of society that is so passionate about the way that people in poverty spend money making food choices?  Hmmmm?  I can’t even imagine why…

Shaming the Poor for Their Food Choices Allows Me to Project my Own Money & Food Shames onto Others So That I Can Bury My Business Under Layers of Anger and Judgement

Well, you do have a point there.  You can read more about that here.

 

Melody grew up in poverty, and she was homeless throughout most of her childhood. Even after the hard work of getting out of poverty was accomplished, she still lived in fear of the next bad thing that could happen. She knew that, without the security of a safety net, one misstep would mean certain disaster. It was not until this safety net was established that she truly felt liberated and free from the anxiety of living in poverty once again. She is now motivated to share this sense of freedom with all women.

6 Comments

  1. Gwen 2 years ago

    What about WIC? They tell you what you can get. Just a thought. I don’t understand how one is different from the other???

    • Melody Smith Jones 2 years ago

      That’s an important question. I’m actually quite familiar with both programs. The WIC program has the specific purpose of decreasing premature birth by giving pregnant woman and mothers of infants/small children access to particular key nutrients found in very specific foods. WIC is only meant to cover the bare essentials (cereal, milk, cheese, baby formula, eggs and juice). However, even with this limited scale, there are problems with the program. There is much embarrassment found at checkout for moms that bought the right item but perhaps not the right brand or size.

      Now let’s imagine if a mother had to do that for every item in her cart (as opposed to just the bare essential WIC items). The SNAP (food stamp) program has a much wider net needed to meet the nutritional needs of a wide variety of nutritional patterns and needs. That adds a tremendous additional amount of complexity, which would exponentially compound the confusion and embarrassment at check out.

      • Sandy 2 years ago

        WIC around here is delivered.

    • Wood 1 year ago

      Heck yeah this is exlatcy what I needed.

  2. PG 2 years ago

    The problem I have with junk food and food stamps ~ in the state of WV there is NO sales tax on food for everyone BUT junk food. So if I now pay tax on junk food, then people that receive food stamps should also pay the tax.

  3. nikkole 2 years ago

    I have seven children under eight, i make ubder 14,900 dollars a year. And you can bet your ass its not by choice. I use snap benefits. I couldnt feed my children without it. I lack the funding.
    I dont do drugs, im not a horrible human being, i am constantly looking for more income. Ive even tried stripping because my children are worth anything.
    With couponing, budgeting and awarness of sales im able to feed my family and donate to the local food bank.
    Ive seen people look at me in the checkout like ive failed or must be a horrible person because im using ebt to buy candy. They dont think about the things my kids go without, they dont think about second hand clothing, or moving because rent prices, they dont see my beat up minivan or my attempts to stretch my last hundred dollars to cover diapers and school supplies. All they see is a woman who they think is trying to milk the government (because the fact that birth control does fail is a terrifying thought) by having more children.
    They dont see the light in my kids eyes when they get dessert for the first time in a week. God forbid my childrenget oreos, we are poor people. Therefore my kids dont deserve it.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*